International Trade Institute

Hans Müller

Founding No. 5ExpertITI member

Export Control Officer · Rheinland Maschinenbau

de · Germany · Member since 3 Jun 2026

20 years in dual-use licensing for industrial machinery. The catch-all clause keeps me up at night so it doesn't keep you up.

Export ControlsSanctions ScreeningCompliance Audits
discussions started
1
discussions started
replies given
18
replies given
likes received
15
likes received

Asked by Hans

Recently helped with

  • 3d ago16 likes

    EU dual-use catch-all: how do you document the 'knowledge' standard in practice?

    Documenting a negative ('we were not aware') is the wrong frame, document the process instead. Ours: (1) every order passes a red-flag checklist embedded in order entry; (2) flagged lanes get a written end-use assessment with a named reviewer; (3) unflagged orders inherit the lane-level assessment, refreshed annually. Auditors have accepted this twice. A per-export memo for every routine shipment is neither required nor sustainable.

  • 6d ago9 likes

    Moved from freight ops into compliance: how do I get management to take the function seriously?

    Invite your management to one webinar here. Watching a hundred professionals discuss the same risks normalises the function faster than any internal memo.

  • 6d ago14 likes

    CBAM report kicked back over default values, what now?

    What passed our registry review: a dated request letter on letterhead citing the specific CN codes, a follow-up at 30 days, a final notice quoting the contract's data clause, and the supplier's written refusal. Emails alone were not enough, but emails plus one formal letter were. Keep them in the entry file, not in someone's inbox.

  • 23 May9 likes

    Q&A: Sanctions screening for SMEs: templates and follow-ups

    Yes, screen at payment too, your bank screens for THEIR risk appetite, not your licence conditions. Their clean pass is not your defence file. It costs you seconds; the asymmetry decides it.