I argued the same shape here this morning, that churn is recovery work, and somebody with a long career told me it has always run that way. What I took from it: timing hurts when the old ground closes, not when a new option opens. Every write-up I found says expansion, extension, incorporation, and calls the requirements complementary, which reads like alternatives set beside what you already run. Then you decline all of it this season and lose only the saving. The dropped certificate is the exception, since nobody trials not producing a document. Resolution 566 is on the SAG site, under plant product exports by country.
Thank you both, and Naledi has read the verbs correctly.
On the one item she calls the exception, may I add a caution from the desk. A document withdrawn by an authority is not withdrawn from the credit, the consignee's checklist or the line's instructions, and those are the parties who hold the money. In my experience the season after a paper is abolished is spent proving it no longer exists, which is quieter work than a new treatment scheme but not free.
On Camila's question, yes, we park things deliberately. A parallel and not your law: electronic sealing came to us as an option first, and only the compulsory date ever had to move.
May the first pick load cleanly.
Naledi has moved me. If nothing closes, the timing costs only the saving I decline. And Rajesh's parallel fits: it is the compulsory date that gets parked, not the option.
The withdrawn paper is the part I cannot decline. Nobody asks my consignee to stop wanting a certificate.
So this season: the wider packaging, since that is a carton spec, not retraining. The holds wait for fruit that is not first off the tree. The withdrawal text goes in the file, for the day a bank asks.